Commentaires sur : Anonymous methods make elegant proxies http://blog.neteril.org/2007/08/25/anonymous-methods-make-elegant-proxies/ Random thoughts of Jérémie Laval Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:32:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Par : garuma http://blog.neteril.org/2007/08/25/anonymous-methods-make-elegant-proxies/comment-page-1/#comment-33 garuma Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:07:27 +0000 http://garuma.wordpress.com/2007/08/25/anonymous-methods-make-elegant-proxies/#comment-33 Back in the day it was working. Now it's not the case anymore for that sample. I will update when I have time. Meanwhile, as another example, this pattern is also useful with Gtk# Application.Invoke(EventHandler) when you want to execute some piece of code not contained in a EventHandler-style method on the GUI thread. Back in the day it was working. Now it’s not the case anymore for that sample. I will update when I have time.

Meanwhile, as another example, this pattern is also useful with Gtk# Application.Invoke(EventHandler) when you want to execute some piece of code not contained in a EventHandler-style method on the GUI thread.

]]> Par : Chris http://blog.neteril.org/2007/08/25/anonymous-methods-make-elegant-proxies/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Chris Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:23:06 +0000 http://garuma.wordpress.com/2007/08/25/anonymous-methods-make-elegant-proxies/#comment-32 That last example is not great - when you omit the parameter list on the anonymous method, the overloading is ambiguous. (ThreadStart and ParameterizedThreadStart both match) Or does the Mono C# compiler have some notion of a "best" match, that the Microsoft compiler does not? That last example is not great – when you omit the parameter list on the anonymous method, the overloading is ambiguous.

(ThreadStart and ParameterizedThreadStart both match)

Or does the Mono C# compiler have some notion of a « best » match, that the Microsoft compiler does not?

]]>