<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : WiFi power saving &amp; kernel 2.6.31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.neteril.org/2009/10/28/wifi-power-saving-kernel-2-6-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.neteril.org/2009/10/28/wifi-power-saving-kernel-2-6-31/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts of Jérémie Laval</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Par : ano</title>
		<link>http://blog.neteril.org/2009/10/28/wifi-power-saving-kernel-2-6-31/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>ano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.neteril.org/?p=708#comment-411</guid>
		<description>did you guys find any way to further reduce wireless power consumption under 2.6.32 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you guys find any way to further reduce wireless power consumption under 2.6.32 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Jérémie Laval</title>
		<link>http://blog.neteril.org/2009/10/28/wifi-power-saving-kernel-2-6-31/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jérémie Laval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.neteril.org/?p=708#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Yup, power_level entry is really gone. It is supposed to be replaced by another sysfs entry which is less strict. Anyway, the point is that, AFAICT, the driver is now smart enough to take care of the power management bits by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, power_level entry is really gone. It is supposed to be replaced by another sysfs entry which is less strict. Anyway, the point is that, AFAICT, the driver is now smart enough to take care of the power management bits by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://blog.neteril.org/2009/10/28/wifi-power-saving-kernel-2-6-31/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.neteril.org/?p=708#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Tried it today.
The module installed ok but the power_level file in sysfs is not there anymore so I cant control the power level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried it today.<br />
The module installed ok but the power_level file in sysfs is not there anymore so I cant control the power level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
